As Seen On TV
Register  |  Sign In  |  Forums Help
Jump to Page:   1 · 2  |  Next Page
blog article
blog info
synopsis

articles
article
description
body
Melrose Place History repeats itself. Everything old is new again. You know the drill.

Those cliches are about as tired as TV and movie remakes, but they just keep on coming.

The CW has officially given the green light to yet another Fox rehash, "Melrose Place," according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Our own Tracy Phillips already dropped the news last month that Ryan Eggold would likely be leaving the CW's current remake of "90210," where he plays teacher Ryan Matthews. There's still no word on the return of Heather Locklear to the new version, but Eggold said he thought she'd do it.

THR reports Oscar-winning director Davis Guggenheim will helm the new "Melrose," and he will serve as an executive producer along with Darren Swimmer and Todd Slavkin, who wrote the original series. Guggenheim is known mostly for darker and more dramatic work, like "Deadwood," "24" and "NYPD Blue," but earlier in his career he worked on lighter dramas, such as "Party of Five" and "Sisters." He won his Oscar for Al Gore's global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth."

In other remake/import news, THR also reports that Fox has cast Zosia Mamet, the daughter of writer David Mamet ("The Unit") to star in its remake of the British comedy, "Absolutely Fabulous."

*** Click here to comment! What do you think of a "Melrose" remake? Should Heather Locklear come back?


Message Edited by Victor_Balta on 02-24-2009 09:43 AM
Comments
comments
article
description
  • comment number 1
  • date 02-24-2009 11:02 AM
  • author melrose_fan writes:
body Heather Locklear made that show. I'm hopeful that she would return. If she didn't it would probably be a flop.
article
description
  • comment number 2
  • date 02-24-2009 11:04 AM
  • author Byzanium3 writes:
body Heather Locklear should definitely return, as should
the duplicitous Dr. Michael Mancini. We could do
without the gay Matt character.
article
description
  • comment number 3
  • date 02-24-2009 11:12 AM
  • author airhd101 writes:
body I watched the original Melrose Place and it was one of my favorite shows back then. If I remember correctly, didn't they blow up the building on the last episode? If the remake is anything like the current 90210 disaster, then I would say don't bother. So I can see it now, Heather Locklear would be the new Mr. Roper like on three's company, a bunch of anorexic Melrose wanna be's living there fighting over the same three guys (like there are no other men on the planet). Been there, done that. The remakes are never as good as the originals. I was so dissapointed with the 90210 remake. The storyline line is a weaker copy of the original, the acting isn't believable, I found myself not really caring about the characters. If you don't care about the characters than you have no reason to tune in next week.
article
description
  • comment number 4
  • date 02-24-2009 11:14 AM
  • author melrose_fan writes:
body It would be nice for peter to return as well. I don't think we could make it without peter and michael.
article
description
  • comment number 5
  • date 02-24-2009 11:54 AM
  • author bjsdj writes:
body without heather there was no Melrose
article
description
  • comment number 6
  • date 02-24-2009 12:39 PM
  • author OCANGEL writes:
body There is NO WAY a remake of Absolutely Fabulous will hold a candle to the original!
article
description
  • comment number 7
  • date 02-24-2009 02:48 PM
  • author Terry49 writes:
body i agree no melrose without Heather Locklear
article
description
  • comment number 8
  • date 02-25-2009 08:25 AM
  • author wbrogan3 writes:
body I AM SO EXCITED ABOUT THE RETURN OF MELROSE. PLEASE MAKE IT AS DELICIOUSLY EVIL AS THE FIRST WITH GREAT STORIES & GOOD, HOT ACTORS.
AND OF COURSE IT WILL NOT BE THE SAME WITHOUT HEATHER LOCKLEAR. I HOPE SHE RETURNS.
article
description
  • comment number 9
  • date 04-04-2009 07:16 AM
  • author boring1 writes:
body yes, she did a great job last time...
Jump to Page:   1 · 2  |  Next Page