For What It's Worth
Register  |  Sign In  |  Forums Help
Jump to Page:   1 · 2  |  Next Page
blog article
blog info
synopsis

articles
article
description
body With job losses mounting, it's more important than ever that we all prepare for a financial emergency. But short of knowing that we should be "saving for a rainy day," few Americans have a solid game plan. That's the bad news.

The good news is that the most basic of financial emergency planning is about as straightforward as it gets. It all starts with your Emergency Fund.

Even better, setting up such a Fund is easier than you think. The only rule is that the assets in the account should be liquid. In short, that means cold, hard cash. Not cash in your mattress (though that is better than nothing), but a simple savings or money-market account will do.

I know what you're thinking: Why would I want to waste my time with a simple savings account that earns 1 percent interest... or less? But the sole goal for your Emergency Fund is to be just that: an Emergency Fund. This is not the money you're setting aside for retirement; it's not Junior's college fund, and it's not your long-term capital-appreciation investment money.

The $64,000 Question

Think of your Emergency Fund as a replacement for your biweekly paycheck, should you lose your job. It should be enough to act as your source of "income" for the duration of the financial emergency.

Which brings us to the big question: How much is "enough"? This is where things get a little tricky.

Browse the Web and you'll find no shortage of financial experts and journalists weighing in on this topic.

Dave Ramsey says 3-6 months of your personal expenses will do, though you can start smaller than that with just $1,000. Laura Bruce of Bankrate.com agrees.

Anna Prior of The Wall Street Journal advises that you set aside 6-12 months' worth of living costs.

And The Motley Fool suggests you may even want to prepare for a long, cold winter… and spring… and summer… and fall -- many times over -- with a 5-year emergency fund.

Plus there are plenty of other opinions where these came from.

Must You Acquit?

The reality is that there's no right answer to this question. Financial planning is not a one-size-fits-all or even a one-size-fits-most subject. It's more like a tailored suit than it is a free sweatshirt. I'd much rather know that you're heading to the tailor for alterations than hear that the ugliness of the sweatshirt scared you off completely.

So the closest thing to a right answer in today's uncertain economic environment then is that whatever your target savings goal amount is, this Emergency Fund should be financial priority No. 1 in American households.

This means that if you feel like your Fund is short of where it needs to be to make you comfortable, you need to make sure it gets there -- and fast. Until it does, put your other major financial plans on hold.

Much as it pains me to say it, this may be the time to pare back any debt repayment, retirement savings, mortgage-principal paydown, college savings, or other long-term investing you've undertaken. You needn't (and shouldn't) stop these other wise financial practices altogether.

Continue to take advantage of your employer's 401(k) match, pay at least a little more than the minimum on any revolving credit balances and lest there be any confusion, stay current on your mortgage. But until your Emergency Fund is up to snuff, reroute a substantial amount of your disposable income in that direction.

Hopefully the financial storm will soon give way to sunny skies. But don't let that kind of wishful thinking cloud your judgment. If you continue to save for a rainy day... you'll stay dry in the end either way.

Is your Emergency Fund balance where it needs to be? How much do you have saved? Share your story.

Message Edited by Anthony_Catalano on 03-11-2009 09:46 AM
Comments
comments
article
description
  • comment number 1
  • date 03-11-2009 11:01 AM
  • author tma writes:
body are you serious? 5 years?? If you could "set aside" 5 years worth of living expenses you would be so well off you wouldn't need a rainy day fund. Who are they kidding?
article
description
  • comment number 2
  • date 03-12-2009 03:08 AM
  • author solarpsyclone writes:
body "If you can afford to pay your electric bill you can afford to upgrade your home to solar." No equipment to purchase, no installation costs, no maintenance fees, no permit hassles, no performance worries, and no rate increases for up to 25 years. "Take back your power, produce your own energy, and keep the savings." www.jointhesolution.com/solarpsyclone
article
description
  • comment number 3
  • date 03-12-2009 10:09 PM
  • author hooha writes:
body We have always tried to live within our means. Credit card debt paid EVERY month. Have 6+months rainy day fund. It's a no-brainer. Now we're asked to bail out the irresponsible. Oh well!
Socialism is here and we'll all be screwed.
article
description
  • comment number 4
  • date 03-13-2009 11:57 AM
  • author 0690 writes:
body Discipline and the courage to actually say no seem to have been eliminated as possibilities to a great number of people who have the audacity to claim a, "legal right", to many things in life. The legal rights are to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the United States. Whether the majority of people who have some intelligence or not will admit the following is subject to the effect on personal goals: some want to use others money to give a house to everyone, to buy votes for political power and/or office, self induced health problem(s) treatments, or anything else they desire but are unable to attain through personal legitimate efforts. The truth is that we are not equal. There is a tremendous variation in physical attributes, mental attributes, personal sensory perspective, and the immediate environment which together determine our chances of being what we and others consider successful. In this country we are only supposed to be guaranteed the opportunity. When attempts to guarantee outcomes occur the outcome loses its value because most all receive the trophy, house, car, steak, whatever. If you are unable to run faster than the others in the race you should not be awarded the trophy. If you do not meet income and other normal credit requirements you should not be offered a loan to purchase a house. If you miss days of work you should not be paid. There has to be effort or time spent or perserverance or self denial or actual physical pain or some combination of these factors for resultant outcomes of activities to have a positive satisfying indication of having achieved some semblance of success compared with others.
article
description
  • comment number 5
  • date 03-13-2009 03:33 PM
  • author BobMar46 writes:
body I am retired and we keep about a year worth of expenses in cash. Some of the reserve is due to variations in monthly income from investments/expenses. Some is used for periodic purchases on which we find it easier to have the cash when they come up rather than finance them. We saved a lot when we were young and the investments grew so an early retirement became a reality.
article
description
  • comment number 6
  • date 03-15-2009 09:49 AM
  • author mprob1979 writes:
body What world do these people live in? If you need to take money from us, how and why the hell should anyone in there company get a bonus/raise or any thing else.
I am so tired to hear about this, when I am only able to live from payday to payday without buyin essitinals like food for my family.
If the goverment wanted to help this ecoamany give people like us the money so we can get caught up on our bills and food and put more money into the system. Give the money to the people who are trying and need it than to those who have it but want more just to have it or to those who are not trying and expect it.
My credit score has gotten really bad due to this situation and I can not get help or a loan but the goverment is giving money to all these companys that have gone bad also due to this situation, but they are getting help to give those bonus's to people who have a terrible job.
article
description
  • comment number 7
  • date 03-15-2009 10:39 PM
  • author peroplano writes:
body With three college courses in economics under my belt the one thing I am certain of is; it's a tea leaves and mirrors.
article
description
  • comment number 8
  • date 03-16-2009 07:34 AM
  • author xat writes:
body i coukd not agree more with mrop1979. who are people kidding save money. i have worked my entrie life . and now when i am looking for help i can not find it.instead my tax dollars are going to companies that find themself in trouble . when is it our turn. i have a penision but can not touch it because of stupid rules that it will hurt the co. i work for.it is time someone started helping the people who are paying to bailout all these companies that have idots running them. let us take money out of are 401 and penisionswithout penalties and taxes.
article
description
  • comment number 9
  • date 03-16-2009 08:31 AM
  • author marcowrite writes:
body OVERHEARD IN WASHINGTON
Now that Obama has resigned, what are we going to do with the economy, Mitch?
Asked Senator Boehner to Senator to Senator Mitch McConnell.
Not to worry - replied Mitch - call Rush, Sean and Cramer!
Jump to Page:   1 · 2  |  Next Page