Blinded by the Hype!
Register  |  Sign In  |  Forums Help
Jump to Page:   1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7  |  Next Page
blog article
blog info
synopsis

articles
article
description
body
Yesterday UK bloggers The Quietus posted a preview of the new Metallica album after hearing it at an invite-only session in London. Their coverage -- which you can still find here -- is a relatively fair piece that discusses the hardship of being a Metallica fan some twenty years after their epic, "...And Justice for All."

The Quietus contributor "Bob Mulhouse" is circumspect about the album's prospects, saying, "This album could be good, or it could be mediocre – too much depends on the other four songs to make a call at this point." Nothing out of the ordinary for a record review after a one-time listen.

It came as something of a surprise then to find that the internet had been expunged of any coverage of the event. We emailed The Quietus editor Luke Turner about what happened. He gave this response:

The story behind the removal of the article runs as follows: Metallica held an album listening party for selected music journalists in London this Wednesday past. One of the writers was kind enough to write a piece about the album which, if you were lucky enough to read it before it was taken down, was full of praise about a return to form. At no point was the writer ask[ed] to sign a non-disclosure agreement. The Quietus and other websites ran pieces on the album, but were quickly contacted by Metallica’s management via a third party and told to remove the articles. The Quietus kept our article up the longest and, as no non-disclosure agreement had been signed, [was] not prepared to remove it merely due to the demands of Metallica’s management. We only eventually removed the article earlier today to protect the professional interests of the writer concerned (the piece was written anonymously). Seems Metallica’s fear of the internet shows no sign of abating.
Interesting, huh? We're still waiting for comment from Metallica's camp, and will post their response when we receive it. Developing...

Related:


Message Edited by blindedbythehype on 06-06-2008 03:33 PM
Comments
comments
article
description
  • comment number 1
  • date 06-06-2008 12:50 PM
  • author bacchussa writes:
body
Just another chapter of self-absorbed millionaire hicks from Fremont Ca. When are they going to realize that they are not the greatest band on earth and really, their music is mediocre at best? Idiots.

Message Edited by bacchussa on 06-06-2008 12:51 PM
article
description
  • comment number 2
  • date 06-06-2008 01:54 PM
  • author kickinblonde writes:
body And people wonder why I hate Metallica so much.
article
description
  • comment number 3
  • date 06-06-2008 02:06 PM
  • author Brandenlee writes:
body Metallica Is From Los Angeles, California

And Posting Clips Of Someone Music Like That Guy Did Is Copyrighting Anway
article
description
  • comment number 4
  • date 06-06-2008 03:45 PM
  • author Tbone67 writes:
body Time to brush up on Metallica Brandenlee. Metallica is from the SF Bay Area, relocated to LA during the glam/hair metal years and relocated back to the Bay Area.

Other than that, who cares what Metallica's doing to 'protect' their music? At least other artists have embraced the change in times. Metallica seems to be stuck in the dark ages.
article
description
  • comment number 5
  • date 06-06-2008 03:54 PM
  • author Daywalker5150 writes:
body Wow Metallica may be stuck in the dark ages but their music is far from their roots. Yes the were from the Bay area any old school Metallica fan like myself can tell you that. But case in point is that they have completely gone over the edge. First they fight Napster which was used by their fans and now they threaten law suits against people who write reviews about their new album? And never made any writer sign a disclosure. Are they that afaraid of their inability to write good music anymore? If they are so worried about people stealing their music then go out and do what every other blue collar worker does. GO OUT AND WORK!!!!! If you tour they will go and see you. Most other bands realize the music industry is not what it used to be so they go out and tour all the time. It's sad because I was a Metallica fan when they were completely underground now I feel betrayed but what WAS a great band.
article
description
  • comment number 6
  • date 06-06-2008 04:44 PM
  • author metalhead2 writes:
body now wait a min,metallica still rocks and is still one of the best bands around.its one thing to write a review but quite another to steal material and release it.what if the writer in question had one of his articles ripped off by another writer and posted under their name.same principle.bottom line,its stealing!
article
description
  • comment number 7
  • date 06-06-2008 04:48 PM
  • author sully00 writes:
body metallica is a good band. It's too bad they subscribe to censorship. I guess that's what happens when you sell out.
article
description
  • comment number 8
  • date 06-06-2008 04:52 PM
  • author Mr_X writes:
body I have to agree with the whole sueing because of bad review part. That is pretty selfish of them but the whole reason they were against napster was because of other bands inablity to break through. If no one wants to buy albums then the record companys will not be spending all that case on new up and comers. simple economics
article
description
  • comment number 9
  • date 06-06-2008 04:57 PM
  • author morningstar writes:
body Metallica has SUCKED for 20 plus years now.This band died along with Cliff Burton so who really gives a f*#k what they are doing in 2008.
Jump to Page:   1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7  |  Next Page