Blinded by the Hype!
Register  |  Sign In  |  Forums Help
Jump to Page:   1 · 2
blog article
blog info
synopsis

articles
article
description
  • date 07-08-2009 02:02 PM
  • author Moderator JT_Ramsay writes:
body
So remember that shockingly tasteful Michael Jackson memorial that took place yesterday? You might've noticed that it was a pretty opulent affair, paid for by the taxpayers of Los Angeles. If you've been paying close attention, you might also know that California is facing a serious deficit, so paying for Michael Jackson's funeral service might seem a bit of a stretch.

Maybe you thought some beneficent corporation would step forward to foot the bill, or that the Jackson estate would pony up to cover the expense. You'd be wrong, but it's a nice thought. Instead, the Mayor of Los Angeles is reaching out to Michael Jackson fans the world over, asking them to donate to a PayPal account to help defray the costs of the ceremony.

That's right. You're not dreaming. The Mayor of Los Angeles has taken the same approach to microfinancing the Michael Jackson memorial as any random blogger might try to pay for his or her hosting fees.

What Do You Think?



Would you help pay for Michael Jackson's memorial?Click here to comment



Message Edited by JT_Ramsay on 07-08-2009 02:04 PM
Comments
comments
article
description
  • comment number 10
  • date 07-09-2009 01:54 PM
  • author suezdawter writes:
body The private affair was sufficient. The public affair was for the public fans. If they want to donate, they should be allowed to do so. To properly honor the deceased, people should donate to all the charities MJ supported.
article
description
  • comment number 11
  • date 07-09-2009 02:07 PM
  • author mucmuc2 writes:
body Tacky, tacky tacky. It should come out of Michael Jackson's eastate, but it should have been negotiated before it took place.
article
description
  • comment number 12
  • date 07-10-2009 04:38 PM
  • author Mollystrongg writes:
body The Jackson estate should help pay for the memorial service. If there was not money, then why would the city go into debt?
article
description
  • comment number 13
  • date 07-12-2009 09:38 PM
  • author mumsinjerz writes:
body NO. When is enough really enough?

How many things can a middle income American donate towards? This is INSANE !
article
description
  • comment number 14
  • date 07-20-2009 10:16 PM
  • author cori2121 writes:
body Comment 1 was dumb. If there was no money for a memorial, then there shouldn't have been one.
Jump to Page:   1 · 2