Russakoff Rules
Register  |  Sign In  |  Forums Help
Jump to Page:   1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · »  |  Next Page
blog article
blog info
synopsis

articles
article
description
body
MEMO

To: Hall of Fame Voters
From:
The Indignancy Police

Re: Your Blatant Hypocrisy


They all cheated. Get over it.



You know what? This is ridiculous. The All-Star ballots have been cast, and Mark McGwire, the second-best power hitter of his generation (just behind Pete Incaviglia), received 23.6 percent of the vote.

The 23.6 percent translates into 128 votes—exactly the same number of votes cast for him last year. Less than a quarter of all those honored with the right to cede entry into this country’s most prestigious Hall felt Mark McGwire was worthy.

Now normally, I heed to the columnists’ code: Never Rip on Your Fellow Writer. But due to the fact that I don’t consider myself much of a writer, I’m going to give myself a pass here and have a go at my supposed colleagues.

This “I’m not here to talk about the past” guff has to stop.

The guy cheated. Get over it. So did many (perhaps most) of his generation. It’s time for the voters to get off their holier-than-thou keisters and start treating McGwire honestly.

I get the whole “sanctity of the game” angle. I’m disgusted about what happened to baseball in the ’90s and beyond. The drugs that invaded the game not only tainted the accomplishments of our heroes of the past but also jeopardized our children’s opportunity to play the game purely.

But what’s the solution? Ban all players of the Steroid Era from the Hall of Fame? Or just the ones who got caught? Or maybe only the ones who looked like imbeciles in front of Congress?

And if your thought is “screw them all,” how is that fair? Where is baseball’s culpability in all this? And what about a guy like Ken Griffey Jr.? Do you punish him for the era in which he played? From everything we know, the guy is completely clean. But we all know we’ll never know everything.

Here’s the thing: We can’t compare McGwire’s or Dykstra’s or Bonds’ or Sosa’s stats to those of Ruth, Aaron, and Cobb. The drugs have muddied the generational comparison. But we can compare them to each other. All of these guys—pitchers included—have “enhanced” numbers.

So don’t compare Big Mac’s 583 home runs in 6,187 at-bats to Mike Schmidt’s 548 in 8,352 ABs. Compare them to Sheffield’s 480 in 8,531 ABs or Rafael Palmeiro’s 569 in 10,472 ABs.

Look at the fact that the man has been on 12 All-Star teams--12! No one in history has ever been on 12 All-Star teams and been denied Hall of Fame entry.

Only six men have hit more home runs than McGwire. Ever.

Think about that.

And think about this: Chad Allen, Mike Bell, Larry Bigbie, Ricky Bones, Howie Clark, Paxton Crawford, Brendan Donnelly, Chris Donnels, Ryan Franklin, Tim Laker, Cody McKay, Bart Miadich, Daniel Naulty, Luis Perez, Stephen Randolph, Adam Riggs, Ricky Stone.

Recognize any of those names? All of them were in the Mitchell Report but none of them has any prayer of Hall of Fame consideration (in fact, none of those guys has any prayer of being pre-approved for a credit card).

Maybe the connection between performance enhancers and performance isn’t so clear cut. Maybe you actually need talent to be good. What a concept.

Throughout baseball’s history, there have been tons of cheaters. Corked bats, sand-papered gloves, Crisco, Bardol, Vagisil (“You put snot on the ball?”), pine tar excess, greenie poppers—all these practices dominated the game for decades. And yet, because writers are hung up on the inability to compare apples to apples, they are going to ignore some of the best ballplayers the Earth has ever seen.

Are you going to tell me Barry Bonds isn’t a Hall of Fame baseball player without the Clean and Clear? Or that McGwire never would have had the strength to be one of baseball’s best power hitters without steroids (allegedly)?

The dirty secret is that these guys grew up in a baseball environment that embraced the old “if you ain’t cheatin’, you ain’t tryin’” mantra. So they cheated…along with many (most) of their peers.

But suddenly, the writers got indignant and changed the rules. Thy hallowed ground has been soiled.

What a load of garbage.

Mark McGwire is one of the best players of his generation and deserves to be honored in Cooperstown.

Memo to the voters: They all cheated. Get over it.




Message Edited by Lee_Russakoff on 01-24-2008 05:21 PM
Comments
comments
article
description
  • comment number 1
  • date 01-09-2008 02:18 PM
  • author YANKEEFAN48 writes:
body KEEP THEM OUT; ALL OF THEM WHO ARE FOUND TO HAVE BEEN USERS. ESPECIALLY THE LIARS WHO HAVE SHOWN NO CHARACTER, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE ONE OF THE CRITERIA FOR HOF MEMBERS. BONDS, MCGWIRE, SOSA, CLEMENS,PALMEIRO. THEY'RE ALL NOT WORTHY, JUST LIKE A--HOLE PETE ROSE ISN'T WORTHY.
article
description
  • comment number 2
  • date 01-09-2008 02:27 PM
  • author kubasek1 writes:
body I do not agree with all of the things you write on football, Lee, However, you hit the nail on the head with this Big Mac column. Definetly one of the Greatest home run hitters of all time is Mark McGwire.
article
description
  • comment number 3
  • date 01-09-2008 02:31 PM
  • author GGman writes:
body If you let any of the juiced players in the hall of fame better let Pete Rose in. What he did as a player none have matched but because after he retired as a player and went to be a manager and he bet on games and got caught they arn't letting him in. Remember yes he did bet on games he was a manager on but he bet for his team to win he never through a game. So if they let McGwire, Sosa or Bonds in they better let Rose in.
article
description
  • comment number 4
  • date 01-09-2008 02:34 PM
  • author houlkamaniac writes:
body Rose may be an a--hole, but he did nothing to ruin the integrity of the game compared to what these guys have done. He did more for the game....by playing it the way it's supposed to be played. He didn't bet AGAINST his own team. His problem: He broke a rule that is on the clbhouse wall and unfortunately cost him his Hall of Fame ticket.
article
description
  • comment number 5
  • date 01-09-2008 02:40 PM
  • author mjglenn writes:
body Man, I go back and forth on McGwire. If I had a ballot I probably wouldn't check his name right now, but that's only because he's got 13 years left of eligibility. Once we learn more about the era in which he played, writers can make a more informed decision. It's a lot easier to put Big Mac in on a later ballot than it is to remove him if we put him in now and it turns out that he was one of the primary juicers or distributors of juice.

I agree that most of the BBWAA are sanctimonious know-nothing twits, but I have a couple bones to pick with your argument. The argument that, "Lots of other players were doing it, McGwire just happened to be caught" doesn't hold water. Imagine if you were caught shoplifting and told the judge, "Thousands of people shoplift every day, I just happened to get caught. You can't punish me." The judge would laugh in your face. McGwire was caught, and sure, voters will probably elect players to the Hall who used steroids their entire life but were never caught. McGwire was caught though, and should, perhaps, be punished for it.

Your list of quadruple-A players named in the Mitchell Report proves nothing. No one (besides a few knuckleheads on internet message boards) has suggested that steroids mean it no longer takes massive amounts of skill and dedication to become a Major League Baseball player. However, since we don't know exactly how much steroids help, why isn't it possible that without the juice McGwire would have hit about .250/.360/.480 with 350 home runs? That's still a great player but not necessarily a Hall of Famer. Maybe those players named in the Mitchell Report wouldn't have started on your average college baseball team, but PED's allowed them to taste the major leagues .Obviously that's an exaggeration, but the argument that if steroids allow one person to put of HOF numbers they will allow all to is patently ridiculous. Personally, I think Big Mac would have had a hall of fame career without the chemical help, but since we'll never know for sure, I'd have to think long and hard before voting for him to reach the hall.

I'm not going to get on my high horse, but I think most people feel this type of cheating is more egregious than others (I can give a theory as to why if you'd like). I'm not saying that McGwire and the others are bad people, but they got caught breaking the rules. When you break the rules there is a consequence, and perhaps the BBWAA have decided that consequence is you do not get into the Hall of Fame.

(Other rules you should not break if you want the BBWAA to allow you into its hallowed institution: don't pitch on a bad team (see: Blyleven, Bert) and don't spend you best years in Canada (see: Raines, Tim).)
article
description
  • comment number 6
  • date 01-09-2008 02:43 PM
  • author exjersey writes:
body You're off the mark in stating that McGwire should be compared to other players of the era and not players of all eras. It's the HOF; it's for the gods of the game. It's not a KTel "best of the decade" compilation. Supporting McGwire is also ignoring that he was a juicer nearly from day one in MLB.
article
description
  • comment number 7
  • date 01-09-2008 03:02 PM
  • author Watchmaster writes:
body McGwire should be in the HOF! Juicer from day 1? Make up some more crappy one-liners. These are the same voters who were critical of the reporter who saw the bottle of Andro in Mac's locker in '98. Seems like the voters are more interested in being popular. YANKEEFAN48 --get a life, I'm sure you think Clemens (Yankee at the time) is telling the truth.
article
description
  • comment number 8
  • date 01-09-2008 03:07 PM
  • author DEWhite writes:
body I'm glad to hear someone point out sports writer hypocrisy. Yet, I feel this falls short of the mark. To obtain a better comparrison, just look at how many of the sports writers that feel McGwire, Bonds, Clemens and others that are believed to have cheated, are not due the awards and achievements that come with the game.

Then those same writers turn around and feel that football players (Merriman, Harrison) who were suspended due to failing their drug tests may have been snubbed for not winning last year's Defensive Player of the Year award, or are considered class acts and fine examples of what other players should strive for in their position.

That is the true hypocrisy.
article
description
  • comment number 9
  • date 01-09-2008 03:10 PM
  • author offbase writes:
body Mark MaGuire sat on a wall, Mark MaGuire had a big fall, all the players and coaches back then, knew he was cheating, so he does not get in.
Jump to Page:   1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · »  |  Next Page